ArticleJMA journal2026
The Validity and Reliability of a Japanese Version of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Survey: Multicenter Study.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU). Methods: In the present study, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine whether the Japanese data retained the same factor structure as reported in development studies, and CFA was performed using the maximum likelihood estimation method. Results: The CFA for the FS-ICU revealed acceptable model fit indices. The internal consistency of the FS‒ICU subscales was also evaluated. The Cronbach's alpha for the satisfaction with care subscale was 0.967, that for the information needs subscale was 0.935, and that for the process of making decisions subscale was 0.796, indicating high reliability for the first two subscales and acceptable reliability for the third. The FS-ICU score for satisfaction with care was significantly negatively correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) score and depression score, whereas information needs was significantly negatively correlated with HADS-A score (p < 0.05). However, no significant correlations between the FS-ICU and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores were detected. Conclusions: The Japanese version of the FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Japanese population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. Trial registration: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.