Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576964›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2026

Radiation Risk Perception, Breast Cancer Anxiety, and Mental Distress among Women Who Participated in Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Minamisoma City: Five Years after Fukushima's 2011 Triple Disaster.

Ryo Takahashi, Mika Nashimoto, Akihiko Ozaki, Michio Murakami, Yudai Kaneda, Chika Yamamoto, Naomi Ito, Hiroaki Saito, Toyoaki Sawano, Arinobu Hori and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ryo TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Mika NashimotoKameda Medical Center Breast Center, Chiba, Japan.
Akihiko OzakiBreast and Thyroid Center, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Fukushima, Japan.
Michio MurakamiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Yudai KanedaClinical Training Center, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan.
Chika YamamotoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Naomi ItoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Hiroaki SaitoDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Toyoaki SawanoResearch Center for Community Health, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Japan.
Arinobu HoriHori Mental Clinic, Minamisoma, Japan.
Ayu AjitomiBreast and Thyroid Center, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Fukushima, Japan.
Kenji GondaBreast and Thyroid Center, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Fukushima, Japan.
Masahiro WadaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Utsunomiya Central Clinic, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Kazunoshin TachibanaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Tohru OhtakeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Masaharu TsubokuraResearch Center for Community Health, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Japan.
Hiromichi OhiraDepartment of Surgery, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster following the Great East Japan Earthquake did not cause significant physical health effects, but long-term mental distress persists, partly driven by radiation risk perception. Women, particularly those undergoing breast cancer screening in affected areas, may experience heightened breast cancer anxiety and mental distress. The interrelationships among radiation risk perception, breast cancer anxiety, and mental distress remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate these associations among women in Minamisoma, one of the municipalities most severely affected by the disaster. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted among 479 women who attended breast cancer screening at two core breast cancer care centers located more than 20 km north of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. This cross-sectional study assessed breast cancer anxiety, risk perception of breast cancer and radiation exposure, and mental distress. Mental distress was evaluated using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) scale, with scores ≥5 considered significant. Descriptive analyses and regression models were constructed to explore the relationships among these three outcomes. Results: Among participants, 47.4% (227/479) reported moderate mental distress. Higher odds of general breast cancer anxiety were observed among those who perceived a high likelihood of radiation-induced breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.76-5.08; p < 0.001). Higher odds of mental distress were also associated with belief in radiation-induced breast cancer (OR, 1.76; 95% CI: 1.19-2.59; p = 0.004). However, breast cancer anxiety itself was not significantly associated with mental distress (OR, 1.29; 95% CI: 0.83-2.01). Conclusions: Approximately half of the women experienced moderate mental distress five years after the disaster. The results suggest that mental distress is heightened by radiation risk perception and underlying general health concerns, rather than specific factors such as breast cancer anxiety.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsdisastersmass screeningmental healthradiation exposure

Identifiers

PMID42576964
PMCPMC13453577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.