Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576942›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2026

Stricter vehicle standards reduce total pollutants but increase the fraction of toxic organics.

Xinping Yang, Jie Yao, Wenqi Song, Hongfei Chen, Xihui Tong, Zhiheng Wu, Xin Li, Yunjing Wang, Chao Peng, Hang Yin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xinping YangKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Jie YaoKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Wenqi SongKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Hongfei ChenKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Xihui TongKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Zhiheng WuKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Xin LiState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Yunjing WangKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Chao PengChongqing Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing, 401336, China.
Hang YinKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Yan DingKey Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Vehicle Emission Control Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicular emissions are a primary source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which drive urban ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation while posing direct risks to human health. Progressive emission standards and the widespread adoption of hybrid electric vehicles have successfully reduced total hydrocarbon outputs, establishing them as central strategies for climate and air quality management. However, the influence of these technological shifts on the molecular speciation of emissions-and their associated environmental and toxicological trade-offs-remains poorly understood, potentially masking hidden health risks. Here we apply a concentration-reactivity-toxicity framework to characterize species-resolved VOC emissions across conventional and hybrid vehicles under progressive emission standards. While stricter regulations reduced total VOC emissions by 75% in conventional vehicles, the relative contribution of highly reactive oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) surged from 20% to 35%. Notably, a modern hybrid vehicle emitted nearly twice the mass of OVOCs (25.4 mg km

Indexed as

Emission factorSecondary pollutant formation potentialToxicityVehicular emission

Identifiers

PMID42576942
PMCPMC13453575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.