Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576901›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

State of the art on advanced practice nursing role management international theories, models and frameworks: A scoping review.

Shifan Han, Xuan Duan, Wenjing Dong, Jie Lv, Gege Cao, Ruifang Zhu, Qian Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shifan HanSchool of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
Xuan DuanSchool of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
Wenjing DongHealth and Physical Education School, Xi 'an FanYi University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710105, China.
Jie LvSchool of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, Shanxi, 030619, China.
Gege CaoSchool of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
Ruifang ZhuEditorial Office, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Advanced Practice Nurse roles are increasingly adopted to address health system challenges; however, theoretical approaches guiding Advanced Practice Nurse role management remain fragmented. This scoping review aimed to synthesize international theories, models, and frameworks related to Advanced Practice Nurse role management and to identify shared and category-specific core elements to support stage-specific role development. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance, and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Five databases (Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were searched from inception to August 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized using a combined approach of word frequency analysis and iterative cross-framework content mapping to identify shared and framework-specific elements. Results: In the final review, 22 Advanced Practice Nurse role management models and frameworks were included. They were categorized into four purpose-based groups: comprehensive frameworks (n = 2), role definition (n = 7), role implementation (n = 8), and role evaluation (n = 5). Twenty shared core elements were identified within role definition frameworks, 20 within role implementation frameworks, and 21 within role evaluation frameworks, with substantial overlap across categories. Shared elements consistently emphasized advanced patient-centered practice, theoretical and professional foundations, and evidence-informed role development, while category-specific elements reflected stage-related priorities. Conclusion: Advanced Practice Nurse role management frameworks form a coherent continuum across role definition, implementation, and evaluation. Shared core elements highlight universal foundations for Advanced Practice Nurse role development, whereas category-specific elements provide stage-sensitive guidance. This synthesis offers a theoretical resource to support policy development, organizational implementation, and sustainable integration of Advanced Practice Nurse roles, particularly in settings where Advanced Practice Nurse roles are emerging.

Indexed as

Advanced practice nurseModels, theoreticalNurse's roleOrganization and administrationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42576901
PMCPMC13453502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.