ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
State of the art on advanced practice nursing role management international theories, models and frameworks: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Advanced Practice Nurse roles are increasingly adopted to address health system challenges; however, theoretical approaches guiding Advanced Practice Nurse role management remain fragmented. This scoping review aimed to synthesize international theories, models, and frameworks related to Advanced Practice Nurse role management and to identify shared and category-specific core elements to support stage-specific role development. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance, and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Five databases (Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were searched from inception to August 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized using a combined approach of word frequency analysis and iterative cross-framework content mapping to identify shared and framework-specific elements. Results: In the final review, 22 Advanced Practice Nurse role management models and frameworks were included. They were categorized into four purpose-based groups: comprehensive frameworks (n = 2), role definition (n = 7), role implementation (n = 8), and role evaluation (n = 5). Twenty shared core elements were identified within role definition frameworks, 20 within role implementation frameworks, and 21 within role evaluation frameworks, with substantial overlap across categories. Shared elements consistently emphasized advanced patient-centered practice, theoretical and professional foundations, and evidence-informed role development, while category-specific elements reflected stage-related priorities. Conclusion: Advanced Practice Nurse role management frameworks form a coherent continuum across role definition, implementation, and evaluation. Shared core elements highlight universal foundations for Advanced Practice Nurse role development, whereas category-specific elements provide stage-sensitive guidance. This synthesis offers a theoretical resource to support policy development, organizational implementation, and sustainable integration of Advanced Practice Nurse roles, particularly in settings where Advanced Practice Nurse roles are emerging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.