Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576870›Full record

ArticleSustainable microbiology2025

Policy in practice: Cystic Fibrosis Australia and Phage Australia surveys: understanding clinical needs and attitudes towards phage therapy in the cystic fibrosis community.

Stephanie Lynch, Holly Sinclair, Ameneh Khatami, Nicki Mileham, Jessica C Sacher, Jan Zheng, Ruby C Y Lin, Jonathan Iredell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie LynchPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Holly SinclairPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Ameneh KhatamiPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Nicki MilehamCystic Fibrosis Australia, North Ryde, NSW 2114, Australia.
Jessica C SacherPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Jan ZhengPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Ruby C Y LinPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-511X
Jonathan IredellPhage Australia at Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most prevalent serious inherited disease in Australia, imposing significant health risks. CF is characterized by chronic lung inflammation and recurrent pulmonary infections that increase morbidity and premature mortality rates. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) places further challenges on the treatment and management of CF, necessitating research into alternative strategies for treatment of bacterial infections. Bacteriophage therapy, involving bacterial-specific viruses, is a potential avenue for AMR infections in patients with CF. Existing literature supports the feasibility of phage therapy in CF but there has been a gap in investigating attitudes of the CF community including affected individuals and their caregivers, regarding phage therapy. Understanding perspectives and needs of the CF community is essential for successful implementation and acceptance of novel therapies including phage therapy. We conducted a survey that encompasses responses from 112 consumers from across Australia, comprising people living with CF (38.4%), parents of affected children (49.6%), carers (6.4%), and family members (3%). The findings showed a significant reliance on antibiotics with 51.4% requiring oral, 43.4% nebulized, and 11.4% intravenous antibiotics within the preceding 2 weeks. Respondents highlighted the availability of new treatments, duration of hospitalizations and costs associated with treatment as important priorities to address. Despite an awareness of phage therapy among 62.4% of respondents, 86.4% expressed interest in obtaining more information, primarily from medical staff (66.7%). Notably, 96.0% of respondents expressed willingness to participate in phage therapy trials. The results of this survey highlighted the CF community's strong interest in advanced therapeutic approaches, specifically phage therapy. The findings reveal a notable recognition and acceptance of phage therapy as a viable treatment option for pulmonary infections associated with CF. This study addresses UN Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Wellbeing by advancing knowledge on alternative therapeutic strategies for managing AMR in CF. By exploring community attitudes towards bacteriophage therapy, the research promotes informed development and implementation of innovative, targeted treatments for CF-associated infections. These findings support the sustainable management of AMR, fostering better health outcomes and reducing reliance on traditional antibiotics, thereby contributing to long-term health resilience.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistance (AMR)cystic fibrosis (CF)phage therapy

Identifiers

PMID42576870
PMCPMC13375362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.