Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576867›Full record

ArticleSustainable microbiology2024

Microbial water quality investigation through flow cytometry fingerprinting: from source to tap.

Leila Claveau, Neil Hudson, Peter Jarvis, Paul Jeffrey, Francis Hassard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leila ClaveauCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Neil HudsonSouth East Water, Rocfort Road, Snodland, Kent ME6 5AH, United Kingdom.
Peter JarvisCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Paul JeffreyCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.
Francis HassardCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4803-6523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the quality of treated drinking water is crucial for preventing potential health impacts, regulatory fines, and reputation damage. Traditional culture-based microbiological methods often fail to capture the heterogeneity of the bacterial communities in drinking water. This study employed daily interstage monitoring and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis over a period of one year to investigate the dynamics of water treatment processes and service reservoirs. The objective of this study was to test the utility of FCM fingerprints for aiding in microbial event detection. We found that the chlorine concentration contact time was pivotal for microbial log reduction across the treatment works. FCM fingerprints exhibited significant deviations during operational events, such as process interruptions, but did not correlate with the presence of bacterial indicator organisms in the distributed and tap water. Furthermore, the diversity of bacterial fingerprints, quantified by the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index, served as an indicator for identifying potentially poor microbial water quality. In chlorinated waters with low cell counts, the background signal shows potential as a metric to differentiate between different water sources, thereby offering the possibility to characterize breakthrough events in these circumstances that challenge most other microbial analytical methods. Interestingly, groundwater from simpler treatment works showed a higher occurrence of bacterial indicators, whereas surface water works had a lower incidence. These findings underpin the importance of appropriate disinfection even for "low-risk" source waters and the added value that the statistical interpretation of FCM data can offer objective decision making.

Indexed as

disinfectiondrinking waterE. colifaecal indicator organisms (FIO)flow cytometryfluorescent fingerprint analysiswater quality

Identifiers

PMID42576867
PMCPMC13375303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.