Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576859›Full record

ReviewSustainable microbiology2025

Use of bacteriophages for biocontrol of pathogens in food and food-contact surfaces: a systematic review of the literature.

Marie N Jayamanne, Antonio C G Foddai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sustainable microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biocontrol of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products using lytic bacteriophage UHP46: efficacy in milk, cheese, and yogurt.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Efficacy ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie N JayamanneDepartment of Food Science, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BX, United Kingdom.
Antonio C G FoddaiDepartment of Food Science, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BX, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogens adhering to food and food-contact surfaces cause high number of foodborne outbreaks worldwide. Their persistent nature and resistance to conventional sanitation methods pose a threat to the food industry and raise food safety issues. Bacteriophages have increasingly emerged as a possible green technology offering host-specific, and natural ability to target and eliminate pathogens from food and food production settings. The aim of this systematic review was to collate the available scientific information on (i) the efficacy of bacteriophages against pathogens in food and food contact-surfaces, and (ii) their stability under diverse processing conditions. An extensive literature search was carried out using three electronic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline. Forty-nine studies focusing on the reduction of pathogenic bacteria across various food and food-contact surfaces were finally included in this review. Despite some differing results and diverse experimental conditions applied, the overall analysis of the literature confirmed the efficacy of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents in a broad range of food and food surfaces. The findings showed evidence of bacterial reduction against different target pathogens as well as stability under different environmental conditions, including pH and temperature fluctuations normally encountered in food processing environments.

Indexed as

bacteriophagesbiofilmsbio-sanitizationfood and food-contact surfacesfoodborne pathogens

Identifiers

PMID42576859
PMCPMC13375297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.