ArticleSustainable microbiology2026
Microbiome interventions combined with artificial humic acid treatments for restoring soil bacterial diversity.
Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil health is under threat worldwide and technologies for soil restoration are urgently needed. Here we study the effect of artificial humic acids (A-HA) and soil transplants fo one restoration of depleted soil microbiomes. We used a controlled microcosm experiment with gradients of microbial diversity, with and without A-HA, across three soil types. Microbial abundance, diversity, and composition were assessed using qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, complemented by metabolomic profiling of water-extractable compounds and the growth characterization of bacterial isolates. A-HA treatment had a stronger effect on bacterial richness and community structure in degraded than in the original soil. Soil microbiome transplants could partially regenerate microbial abundances and increased bacterial richness and diversity in the degraded soils. Interestingly, the combination of A-HAs with addition of 10% soil transplants yielded the best restoration effect. The effect of individual as well as combined treatments strongly depended on the composition of the native soil microbiome. From a mechanistic point of view, A-HA treatment inhibited fast-growing bacteria, which allowed slow-growing bacteria to recover. By combined treatment, depending on the soil type and its native soil microbiome, we can synergistically restore the soil microbiome to resemble its original composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.