ReviewSustainable microbiology2024
Microbial threats and sustainable solutions for molluscan aquaculture.
Review in Sustainable microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of host background and environmental conditions on disease susceptibility and mortality in the northern bay scallop, Argopecten irradians irradians.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A suite of ddPCR assays targeting microbial pathogens for improved management of shellfish aquaculture.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- MoPSeq-DB: a user-friendly web application for genomic data management and analysis of marine mollusc pathogens.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Bacterial Diversity Associated with Terrestrial and Aquatic Snails.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Isolation and Characterization of Infection of Four New Bacteriophages Infecting aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquaculture is responsible for producing almost half of the world's seafood. As the global climate changes and population continues to increase, we must prepare for increased disease in aquatic animals, a risk compounded by high-density aquafarms that are necessary to keep up with demand. This review will highlight major microbial threats to aquaculture and current and alternative solutions to these threats with consideration for the accessibility of the proposed solutions. Molluscs are ideal for sustainable aquaculture because they require less inputs than most other protein sources, and through filter feeding, they improve local ecosystem health. However, they are also plagued by microbial diseases, and rising water temperatures will only exacerbate this problem by enhancing pathogen survival, range, and growth. At the same time, microbial treatments hold great promise for reducing disease burden and increasing yield and food safety. In order to combat threats to sustainable aquaculture, it is critical to monitor and predict microbial behavior in coastal water and animal populations, explore sustainable microbial treatment options such as probiotics and phage therapy, reduce reliance on antimicrobials, and develop mitigation strategies through partnership with mollusc farmers, government regulators, industry, academic researchers, and indigenous peoples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.