ArticleSustainable microbiology2025
Bridging research gaps and advancing policy for healthy soils.
Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial solutions for a changing world.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The policy framework previously presented by Neale and colleagues in Sustainable Microbiology highlights the central role of soil microorganisms in sustainable agriculture and global food security, offering actionable interventions grounded in emerging scientific advances. However, the translation of soil science and ecology into impactful policy and practice remains limited. This opinion article revisits the longstanding concept of soil biotechnology, and regulatory/societal barriers to progress. We emphasize that the soil microbiome holds untapped potential for improving plant health, reducing agrochemical reliance, and promoting sustainable food systems through continued research. Interkingdom microbial interactions, especially those involving root exudation as a mechanism for microbial recruitment, are proposed as pivotal but underexplored areas of study. Phenotype-driven, trait-based approaches are advocated over traditional phylogenetic methods to better identify functionally relevant microbial consortia and intervention strategies. Furthermore, we stress the need to integrate ecological, agronomic, and economic insights to develop soil-centric food systems. This includes monetizing ecosystem services provided by healthy soils and implementing incentivized conservation schemes. Unlocking the potential of soil microbial ecology requires coordinated, interdisciplinary efforts and a paradigm shift in policy, funding, and public perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.