Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576819›Full record

ArticleSustainable microbiology2025

Bridging research gaps and advancing policy for healthy soils.

Alex Williams, Jim Lynch

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Microbial solutions for a changing world.Sustainable microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex WilliamsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-304X
Jim LynchCentre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The policy framework previously presented by Neale and colleagues in Sustainable Microbiology highlights the central role of soil microorganisms in sustainable agriculture and global food security, offering actionable interventions grounded in emerging scientific advances. However, the translation of soil science and ecology into impactful policy and practice remains limited. This opinion article revisits the longstanding concept of soil biotechnology, and regulatory/societal barriers to progress. We emphasize that the soil microbiome holds untapped potential for improving plant health, reducing agrochemical reliance, and promoting sustainable food systems through continued research. Interkingdom microbial interactions, especially those involving root exudation as a mechanism for microbial recruitment, are proposed as pivotal but underexplored areas of study. Phenotype-driven, trait-based approaches are advocated over traditional phylogenetic methods to better identify functionally relevant microbial consortia and intervention strategies. Furthermore, we stress the need to integrate ecological, agronomic, and economic insights to develop soil-centric food systems. This includes monetizing ecosystem services provided by healthy soils and implementing incentivized conservation schemes. Unlocking the potential of soil microbial ecology requires coordinated, interdisciplinary efforts and a paradigm shift in policy, funding, and public perception.

Indexed as

agroecological policyplant-microbe interactionsroot exudatessoil biotechnologysoil microbiomesustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID42576819
PMCPMC13375290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.