ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2026
[Comparative study on the application of large language models in pre-exam learning for the Chinese dental licen-sing examination].
Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to compare the performance of different large language models (LLMs) in pre-exam learning for the Chinese dental licensing examination, with a focus on evaluating their differences in answering, explanation, and teaching effectiveness, to provide a reference for the application of LLMs in dental education.
methodsThree evaluation scenarios were designed: selecting correct answers, providing answer explanations, and adversarial testing. DeepSeek-R1, Qwen 2.5-MAX, Doubao 1.5 Pro, Xinghuo Spark-X1, ERNIE 4.0 Turbo, GPT-4o, and Huaxi Zhilian were selected for comparative testing. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, net accuracy, and pedagogical effectiveness.
resultsIn the scenario of selecting correct answers, all LLMs exceeded the passing threshold, with Huaxi Zhilian achieving the highest accuracy (84%). In the answer explanation scenario, Huaxi Zhilian demonstra-ted the highest net accuracy (92%), followed by DeepSeek-R1 (89%), among models. Regarding pedagogical effectiveness, Huaxi Zhilian ranked highest in relevance, practicality, and clarity, whereas GPT-4o led in conciseness, among the investigated LLMs. In adversarial testing, Huaxi Zhilian and DeepSeek-R1 exhibited the smallest declines in accuracy and net accuracy, respectively, among the tested models.
conclusionsIn pre-exam learning for the Chinese dental licensing examination, knowledge-enhanced LLMs specifically optimized for dentistry (e.g., Huaxi Zhilian) outperform reasoning LLMs pretrained on general Chinese corpora (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) and those primarily trained on English corpora (e.g., GPT-4o). However, the performance of all models declines under adversarial conditions. Future research should focus on addressing identified weaknesses to enhance the utility of LLMs in dental education further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.