Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576762›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2026

[Geometric analysis of three-dimensional position blocking in implant surgery: clinical decision making of instrument length and implant guidance methods].

Haiyang Yu, Meijun Zhan, Chenyang Xie, Manlin Sun, Aimin Cui, Xinping Zhang, Xinliang Fu, Yang Yang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haiyang YuState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Meijun ZhanState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Chenyang XieState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Manlin SunState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Aimin CuiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xinping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xinliang FuState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yang YangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current design of ideal implant sites often fails to include the assessment of the restrictions imposed by the limited geometric space of the surgical area on instrument manipulation. This limitation may cause three-dimensional position blocking during actual surgery, resulting in the inability to complete implantation at the predesigned geometric position. On the basis of the previously proposed new concept and classification system of surgical area mouth opening (SO), this work divides the surgical procedure into two stages: instrument placement and instrument working. The minimum instrument length required to avoid blocking are precisely calculated and different SO requirements are matched by establishing a complete geometric analysis model and defining key geometric parameters. Consequently, a complete pathway from anatomical space assessment, to instrument length selection, and then to guidance method decision is constructed, realizing a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the virtual designed implant site and the evaluation of the accessibility of the implantation operation. This study further improves the clinical decision-making system of SO and provides a complete arithmetic scheme for the clinical implementation of digital preoperative implant designs.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalDental Implantsclinical decision makingsurgical area mouth openingthree-dimensional position blocking

Identifiers

PMID42576762
PMCPMC13458884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.