ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Real-World Treatment Patterns for Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia: Implications for Treatment Sequencing.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the rarity of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) and scarcity of direct comparative data, there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal therapeutic approach for treatment-naïve patients and subsequent treatment sequence. To bridge such knowledge gap and generate data on most appropriate treatment in relatively resource constraint setting, we conducted this study with 168 WM patients.
methodsDue to the diversity of treatment regimens, patients were categorized into four groups: cytotoxic regimen, rituximab-based regimen, proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based regimen, and bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). Treatment patterns and efficacy outcomes were analyzed.
resultsThe overall response rate (ORR) between rituximab-based vs. PI/IMiD based regimens were similar (74.2% vs. 80.0%,
conclusionOur findings underscore the importance of optimizing treatment strategies and offer real-world data to support informed decision-making in settings with constrained resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.