ReviewNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2026
[Reflections on surgical management strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy].
Review in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is reshaping the treatment landscape of locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). The central clinical challenge has expanded from whether immunotherapy can enhance treatment efficacy to accurate identification of patients who are most likely to benefit and optimization of the subsequent surgical intervention. Accumulating evidence indicates that perioperative immunotherapy-based regimens can improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival (EFS) of the patients, promoting a shift from conventional chemotherapy plus radical surgery toward biomarker-guided, integrated precision treatment. For therapeutic stratification, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and refined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) classification have emerged as key indicators for predicting treatment response and selecting eligible patients. Meanwhile, treatment response assessment has evolved beyond conventional radiological evaluation to a multimodal framework incorporating pathological assessment, liquid biopsy, endoscopy, functional imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, thereby providing more comprehensive support for individualized therapeutic decision-making. However, improved treatment efficacy has also raised new questions for surgical management. In particular, discordant responses between primary tumors and regional lymph nodes have challenged whether D2 radical gastrectomy planned according to pretreatment clinical staging remains the optimal surgical strategy. This review systematically summarizes the evolution of neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locally advanced GC, comprehensive response assessment, and redefinition of gastrectomy extent and lymphadenectomy strategy. Looking forward, with the clinical translation of emerging therapeutic targets such as Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), together with the maturation of AI-driven multimodal assessment systems, GC surgery may move beyond traditional anatomical boundaries. This transition potentially enables "maximally tolerated radical resection" to "function-preserving surgery guided by biological radicality", ultimately providing truly individualized precision surgical treatment for patients with locally advanced GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.