Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576438›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Clinical Outcomes of Single-Dose Flomoxef Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Study of 834 Cases.

Naoya Sugihara, Takatora Sawada, Haruna Arai, Keigo Nishida, Tomoya Ohnishi, Ryuta Watanabe, Kenichi Nishimura, Tetsuya Fukumoto, Noriyoshi Miura, Yuki Miyauchi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naoya SugiharaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7668-0931
Takatora SawadaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.
Haruna AraiDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.
Keigo NishidaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.
Tomoya OhnishiDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.
Ryuta WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-4261
Kenichi NishimuraDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-8653
Tetsuya FukumotoDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-6652
Noriyoshi MiuraDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2229-0948
Yuki MiyauchiDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-3123
Takashi SaikaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProstate biopsy remains essential for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although the transperineal approach is increasingly favored, transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) continues to be performed in many institutions. In our institution, single-dose flomoxef (FMOX) was introduced as a prophylactic antibiotic in response to increasing resistance to levofloxacin (LVFX). This study evaluated the effectiveness and microbiological validity of FMOX using real-world clinical data.

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 834 patients who underwent TRPB under single-dose intravenous FMOX (1 g) between 2015 and 2024. The clinical outcomes were acute prostatitis and sepsis within 4 weeks after biopsy. Post-biopsy bacteriuria was evaluated as an exploratory microbiological outcome. Pathogen distribution was described among patients with identified organisms, and factors associated with post-biopsy bacteriuria were evaluated using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regressions.

resultsAmong 834 patients, prostatitis occurred in 0.5% of patients; no cases of sepsis were observed. Post-biopsy bacteriuria was observed in 6.5% of patients. Among 31 cases with identified pathogens, Enterococcus faecalis was the most common (54.8%), whereas Escherichia coli accounted for 12.9% of cases. Multivariable analysis identified prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score, and constipation as independent risk factors for post-biopsy bacteriuria.

conclusionsSingle-dose FMOX prophylaxis was associated with low rates of acute prostatitis and no cases of sepsis after TRPB. However, the absence of a comparator group and limitations in bacteriuria and culture assessment preclude definitive conclusions regarding its efficacy or microbiological impact. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to clarify the role of FMOX in TRPB prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBacteriuriaCephalosporinsProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProstatitisSepsisAgedBiopsyEnterococcus faecalisHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsflomoxefbacteriuriaflomoxefinfectious complicationsprophylactic antibioticstransrectal prostate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42576438
PMCPMC13458223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.