Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576407›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis

A clinical evaluation and validation of a competing stimulus assessment targeting excessive functional communication responses.

Michelle A Frank-Crawford, Margaret E W Cavanaugh, Drew E Piersma, Savannah Sauter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle A Frank-CrawfordDepartment of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-6317
Margaret E W CavanaughDepartment of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Drew E PiersmaDepartment of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7122-1669
Savannah SauterDepartment of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-2748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional communication training (FCT) is a commonly used treatment for socially maintained challenging behavior. Although highly efficacious, increases in challenging behavior are often observed during schedule thinning within FCT. Prior research has demonstrated that providing competing stimuli in the extinction component of a multiple schedule reduced socially mediated challenging behavior during schedule thinning. Another difficulty practitioners may face is an increase in incorrect functional communication responses (FCRs) during extinction. In the current study, we sought to extend research on FCT and competing stimulus assessments (CSAs) by identifying competing stimuli for FCRs, rather than challenging behavior, for three individuals who exhibited high rates of incorrect FCRs during schedule thinning. We identified high-competition stimuli when we placed the FCR on extinction during the CSA and observed challenging behavior infrequently. Competing stimuli combined with FCT facilitated schedule thinning during treatment, reducing incorrect FCRs while maintaining low levels of challenging behavior.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCommunicationProblem BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleReinforcement Schedulecompeting stimulus assessmentfunctional communicationsafetytangibly maintained challenging behavior

Identifiers

PMID42576407
PMCPMC13457968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.