ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Placental Blood-Flow Velocity Quantification From Diffusion MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Placental Blood-Flow Velocity Quantification From Diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAltered placental capillary blood flow is closely linked to obstetric complications, yet quantifying capillary-scale blood velocity remains challenging with existing imaging methods. This is partially because capillary networks form disordered microvascular beds at the voxel scale, rather than coherent, directional vessels. Here, we combine Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with machine learning to estimate placental capillary blood velocity directly from diffusion MRI (dMRI) data.
methodsMC simulations incorporating perfusion and diffusion were performed to generate signal dictionaries for supervised machine learning regressors (random forest [RF] and multilayer perceptron [MLP]) to estimate velocity, perfusion fraction and diffusivity. The trained regressors were applied to simulated and in vivo dMRI data, with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based estimates as baselines for comparison.
resultsOur approach outperformed IVIM-based methods on simulated test data in recovering ground-truth parameters. Among the evaluated models, the MC-based MLP approach produced physiologically reasonable estimates of velocity in in vivo placentas, in agreement with previously reported measures and exhibited greater sensitivity than IVIM-generated methods.
conclusionThis study presents an approach to characterize capillary perfusion that alternates conventional IVIM models, particularly in organs such as the placenta, where pseudo-diffusion coefficient can be similar to tissue diffusion coefficient, limiting reliable IVIM parameter separation. Our method could enable detection of capillary blood-flow alterations, which could help identify pathological placental blood-flow conditions and potentially diagnosis relevant diseases, such as preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. More broadly, the approach may translate to other organs where microscale blood-flow changes are key indicators of underlying pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.