Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576294›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Placental Blood-Flow Velocity Quantification From Diffusion MRI.

ZhuangJian Yang, Diana Cruz De Oliveira, Leevi Kerkelä, Marco Palombo, Elizabeth Powell, Christopher S Parker, Daniel Cromb, Lisa Story, Serena J Counsell, Kelly Payette and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

ZhuangJian YangHawkes Institute and Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9761-573X
Diana Cruz De OliveiraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Leevi KerkeläHawkes Institute and Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-4305
Marco PalomboCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-7967
Elizabeth PowellHawkes Institute and Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-1188
Christopher S ParkerHawkes Institute and Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-2886
Daniel CrombEarly Life Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-8841
Lisa StoryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Serena J CounsellEarly Life Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Kelly PayetteEarly Life Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-0150
Joseph V HajnalEarly Life Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jana HutterEarly Life Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-3500
Rebecca J ShipleyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel C AlexanderHawkes Institute and Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Paddy J SlatorCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-989X

Funding

Cancer Research UK C44767/A29458DFG Heisenberg 502024488Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V034537/1King's College London Medical Engineering Centre of Research Excellence WT203148/Z/16/ZMedical Research Council MR/T046473/1UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship Renewal MR/T018119/1UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship Renewal MR/T020296/2Wellcome Leap In Utero award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAltered placental capillary blood flow is closely linked to obstetric complications, yet quantifying capillary-scale blood velocity remains challenging with existing imaging methods. This is partially because capillary networks form disordered microvascular beds at the voxel scale, rather than coherent, directional vessels. Here, we combine Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with machine learning to estimate placental capillary blood velocity directly from diffusion MRI (dMRI) data.

methodsMC simulations incorporating perfusion and diffusion were performed to generate signal dictionaries for supervised machine learning regressors (random forest [RF] and multilayer perceptron [MLP]) to estimate velocity, perfusion fraction and diffusivity. The trained regressors were applied to simulated and in vivo dMRI data, with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based estimates as baselines for comparison.

resultsOur approach outperformed IVIM-based methods on simulated test data in recovering ground-truth parameters. Among the evaluated models, the MC-based MLP approach produced physiologically reasonable estimates of velocity in in vivo placentas, in agreement with previously reported measures and exhibited greater sensitivity than IVIM-generated methods.

conclusionThis study presents an approach to characterize capillary perfusion that alternates conventional IVIM models, particularly in organs such as the placenta, where pseudo-diffusion coefficient can be similar to tissue diffusion coefficient, limiting reliable IVIM parameter separation. Our method could enable detection of capillary blood-flow alterations, which could help identify pathological placental blood-flow conditions and potentially diagnosis relevant diseases, such as preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. More broadly, the approach may translate to other organs where microscale blood-flow changes are key indicators of underlying pathologies.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlacentaAlgorithmsBlood Flow VelocityCapillariesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMachine LearningMonte Carlo MethodMultilayer PerceptronsPregnancyRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42576294
PMCPMC13619870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.