SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2026
Predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound for weaning outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two liberations, two physiological targets: implications of the X-COPD trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Aligning prediction targets before ranking diaphragm ultrasound parameters in AECOPD.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) remains a critical ICU challenge that substantially increases mortality. Although point-of-care diaphragmatic ultrasound is widely proposed to guide weaning decisions, its diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain, and the optimal parameter for this high-risk population has yet to be established.
methodsWe systematically searched eight databases through April 5, 2026, for studies evaluating diaphragmatic ultrasound for predicting weaning outcomes in AECOPD. After methodological quality was appraised with the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR-), and diagnostic odds ratios were estimated using bivariate random-effects models, and overall diagnostic performance was summarized by the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Fagan nomograms were constructed to illustrate changes from pre-test to post-test probability. Threshold effects and heterogeneity were assessed using Spearman correlation and the Q test with the I² statistic, respectively. Exploratory meta-regression, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, and Deeks' test were used to investigate sources of heterogeneity, assess result stability, and evaluate funnel-plot asymmetry.
resultsTwenty-three studies comprising 2,000 patients (1,310 successes, 690 failures) were included. Of 14 distinct ultrasound parameters identified, four provided sufficient data for quantitative synthesis. Diaphragmatic excursion (DE, n = 16) showed the most robust and balanced performance, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.85, and an AUC of 0.92. Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF, n = 13) also showed good accuracy (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.77, AUC 0.88). The diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI, n = 8) showed high specificity (0.88) but moderate sensitivity (0.74; AUC 0.85), whereas diaphragmatic contraction velocity (DCV, n = 4) showed only moderate accuracy (AUC 0.70). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for DE, DTF, and D-RSBI.
conclusionsDiaphragm ultrasound, particularly DE, may provide useful prognostic information for weaning outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with AECOPD, while D-RSBI may help identify patients at high risk of weaning failure. However, given the small, predominantly single-centre studies, post hoc study-specific thresholds, substantial heterogeneity, and geographical concentration of the evidence, these findings represent apparent prognostic performance rather than externally validated diagnostic accuracy. Diaphragm ultrasound should therefore be used as an adjunct rather than the sole basis for weaning decisions, pending multicentre external validation and interventional trials demonstrating improved patient-important outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.