ArticleGenome medicine2026
Transcriptome signatures for the identification of bevacizumab responders in ovarian cancer.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome signatures for the identification of bevacizumab responders in ovarian cancer.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Fueling the Seed: Growth Factors and Cytokines Driving Cancer Stem Cells in Gynecological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- CORESH: a gene signature-based search engine for public gene expression datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab is widely used as an anti-angiogenic maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer; however, there are currently no validated clinical criteria to guide patient selection for its use.
methodsTo satisfy the urgent need for bevacizumab response biomarkers, we created a novel RNA-seq dataset (n = 244) and applied unsupervised and supervised machine learning to identify expression signatures associated with benefit from adding bevacizumab to standard treatment and validated our findings using a previously published microarray dataset (n = 377). Additionally, we validated the existence of the discovered signatures using RNA-seq data from the TCGA-OV cohort (n = 426) and performed public expression data mining to provide a biological interpretation of the prioritized signature.
resultsAmong expression signatures reproducibly detected in independent datasets, one was prioritized as a potential predictive biomarker for bevacizumab benefit. Further stratified analysis revealed that over-expression of this signature was associated with improved overall survival in patients who received bevacizumab in addition to standard chemotherapy in both novel (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: (0.23-0.74), adj.p-value = 0.008) and previously published cohorts (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: (0.34-0.75), adj.p-value = 0.003), while no significant survival benefit from bevacizumab was observed in patients negative for this signature. We hypothesize that this signature may be associated with stemness-like features, possibly driven by CTCFL. In addition, we identified several other signatures reproducible in independent datasets and not related to known molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer, which may also represent biomarker candidates and require further validation in additional RNA-seq data.
conclusionsWe identified a previously undescribed expression signature with potential predictive value for bevacizumab benefit, and revealed transcriptional heterogeneity of ovarian cancer that extends beyond current molecular classifications. Given the high heterogeneity of ovarian cancer and that the novel signature only partially explains variation in survival outcomes under bevacizumab treatment, larger RNA-seq datasets are required to further improve predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.