Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576229›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2026

Occupational health risks and provision gaps among live-in caregivers: findings from a qualitative interview study of Polish live-ins in Germany.

Lea Scheuvens, Maria Girbig, Melanie Schubert, Charlyn Görres, Amelie Schirmer, Agnieszka Sykut, Stephanie Drössler, Verena Weihofen, Liv Hübner, Daniel Kämpf and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lea Scheuvens *Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Maria Girbig *Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Melanie Schubert *Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. melanie.schubert@tu-dresden.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-5522
Charlyn GörresInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Amelie SchirmerInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Agnieszka SykutInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stephanie DrösslerInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Verena WeihofenInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Liv HübnerInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Daniel KämpfInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Charlotte PietzschInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katja SchladitzInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska WelzelInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nadja-Raphaela BaerInstitute of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Steffi Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Liane SchenkInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Margrit LöbnerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas SeidlerInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigrant live-in caregivers play an important role in home-based long-term care, yet their working and living conditions remain largely underregulated. Despite increasing evidence of precarious employment and health risks among live-in caregivers internationally, little is known about their occupational health risks and access to occupational health care.

methodsThis qualitative interview study is part of the project Live-In Health and reports findings from 16 semi-structured interviews with Polish live-in caregivers (15 females and one male) working in German private households. Interviews were conducted in Polish, transcribed, translated into German, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis following an inductive-deductive approach. Identified work-related strains and risks were structured in four main domains according to established occupational risk assessment frameworks from the German care sector.

resultsParticipants reported extensive occupational health risks across the four main domains: physical strain (e.g., musculoskeletal strain from patient transfers), psychological strain (e.g., social isolation, conflicts with agencies, emotional burden), occupational safety and health including working hours (e.g., long working hours, insufficient recovery time, lack of preparation and insurance coverage), and exposure to biological and hazardous substances (e.g., wound care, unhygienic living conditions). Access to occupational and general health care in Germany was largely absent. Preventive services, occupational medical examinations, and accident insurance coverage were inconsistently available or missing altogether. Live-ins described substantial barriers related to legal ambiguity, agency practices, lack of information, and unclear responsibilities. At the same time, informal support from families, ambulatory care services, and peer networks emerged as partial coping resources.

conclusionsPolish live-in caregivers in Germany are exposed to considerable occupational health risks while remaining largely excluded from occupational health care structures. The findings highlight substantial gaps in the implementation of existing occupational safety and health regulations for caregivers in private households. Strengthening occupational health protection for live-in caregivers requires enforceable working time regulations, reliable insurance coverage, accessible occupational health services, and clearer oversight of intermediary agencies. Tailored, low-threshold occupational health approaches are urgently needed to address the structural vulnerabilities of this workforce and to ensure healthy and sustainable care provision for the growing demand in home-based care for older people in Germany.

Indexed as

Health prevention and provisionHome-based careLive-inOccupational health careOccupational safetyQualitative interview studyTemporary migrant workers

Identifiers

PMID42576229
PMCPMC13455274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.