ArticleBMC public health2026
Problem gambling and affected others: health, relational and economic outcomes across longitudinal trajectories in a population-based Swedish study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExposure to another person's gambling problems has been linked to a range of adverse outcomes among affected others (AOs); however, most evidence is based on cross-sectional studies. Less is known about how such outcomes vary over time and across different patterns of exposure.
aimThis study examined health (including mental distress, suicidal ideation, hazardous alcohol use, and own gambling behaviour), relational (arguing, exposure to violence), and economic outcomes longitudinally across different trajectories of AO exposure in the general population.
methodsData were drawn from two waves (2018 and 2021) of the Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study (Swelogs). The analytic sample included 2 814 respondents who participated in both waves. AO status was based on a single item asking whether the respondent knew someone close to them who, in their own opinion, had problems with gambling in the past 12 months, and was classified into four trajectories: never AO, former AO, newly AO, and persistent AO. Outcomes in 2021 were compared between each AO trajectory and never AO respondents using chi-square tests and logistic regression models, adjusting for sex, age, and own gambling.
resultsPersistent AOs showed consistently higher prevalence and odds of adverse outcomes across all domains, including serious mental distress, hazardous alcohol use, relational conflict, violence exposure, and economic hardship. Former AOs generally showed attenuated risks relative to persistent AOs, although economic hardship remained significantly elevated after adjustment. Newly AOs exhibited elevated odds of hazardous alcohol use, increased arguing, and economic hardship compared to never AOs.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that AO status may be better conceptualised as a dynamic condition than a fixed one. Both sustained and past exposure to another person's gambling problems were associated with adverse outcomes, with economic hardship showing a particularly persistent pattern. Prevention and support initiatives should consider not only current exposure but also exposure history when identifying individuals at risk. In addition, given the consistent associations observed between AO status and hazardous alcohol use, relational conflict, and economic hardship, individuals presenting with these difficulties in clinical or support settings may also benefit from being asked about exposure to a close other's gambling problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.