Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
Applying a Pharmacometrics-Enabled Machine Learning Analysis to Predict 2-Month Culture Conversion Using Phase 2a Data in a Tuberculosis Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase 2a trials in tuberculosis patients traditionally assess early bactericidal activity over two weeks, often using the time-to-positivity biomarker, followed by a phase 2b study typically lasting 8-week with time-to-event of culture conversion as the endpoint. This study investigated different machine learning models to predict the time-to-event of 2-month culture conversion in the REMoxTB trial with phase 2a time-to-positivity biomarker data and the impact of different phase 2a study lengths. Time-to-positivity at baseline and up to 14 days or 28 days after two moxifloxacin-containing regimens and one control regimen were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The final models were used to predict individual baseline time-to-positivity and time-to-positivity differences between 0 and 14 days or 0 and 28 days. The individual predictions served as features in the following machine learning analysis. Statistical metrics and Kaplan-Meier plots informed model selection. Bi-exponential and exponential decay models described the 14-day and 28-day time-to-positivity data, respectively. In the machine learning analysis, baseline time-to-positivity and/or time-to-positivity differences were ranked as the most important features in all models. Statistical metrics and Kaplan-Meier plots indicated a good fit to culture conversion at 8 weeks using 4-week phase 2a information with a C-support vector classification model. Four-week time-to-positivity phase 2a data provided more information compared to the 2-week time-to-positivity data for the prediction of culture conversion. The workflow demonstrated the potential of machine learning to predict the time-to-event of phase 2b culture conversion up to 8 weeks using time-to-positivity phase 2a biomarker information in a clinical trial assessed with pharmacometric analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.