ArticleOecologia2026
Conspecific mortality and resource availability drive a trait-mediated cascade by modifying sea urchin grazing behavior.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predator risk effects on prey can cascade through food webs and influence ecosystem state via trait-mediated indirect effects (TMIEs). Predicting when these interactions occur and whether they produce community-level effects requires understanding the cues prey respond to, how responses vary with prey attributes and environmental context, and how these components interact. In kelp forest ecosystems, changes in sea urchin foraging behavior in response to food availability or predators can cause state shifts from forests to urchin barrens. It is less clear what cues of predation risk urchins respond to, how these cues interact with food availability, and their effects on kelp mortality. We conducted a field experiment in Monterey Bay, California using cages containing refuge habitat with live kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) and purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) to test for separate and combined effects of a predator cue (red rock crab, Cancer productus), a damaged conspecific cue (crushed urchins), drift kelp, and urchin satiation on urchin exposure (i.e., use of locations exposed to predators), grazing, and kelp mortality. While predator presence did not affect urchin behavior, the damaged conspecific cue reduced urchin exposure (74%), grazing (48%), and kelp mortality (58%). Urchin satiation also decreased the number of exposed grazing urchins (96%) and consumption of live kelp (84%). Adding drift kelp nearly prevented kelp consumption regardless of the damaged conspecific cue, overriding its effect. These findings show predation risk cues can interact with resource availability to modify prey behavior, demonstrating how a trait-mediated indirect effect may cascade to alter ecosystem state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.