ArticleHeredity2026
Short-term impact of a newly built bypass highway and associated watercourse restoration on population genetic structure and recolonisation processes in the southern damselfly (Coenagrion mercuriale).
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Highway construction often leads to habitat fragmentation, altering the genetic features of wild populations. While compensatory measures are commonly implemented to mitigate their negative demographic and genetic impacts, their effectiveness remains species-dependent and difficult to assess. We analysed the short-term impact of a newly built highway in eastern France and the associated restoration measures on population genetic structure in the protected southern damselfly (Coenagrion mercuriale). We genotyped 46 populations collected after the highway construction using microsatellite and SNP markers over two successive years to detect potential genetic discontinuities across the highway. We also evaluated the effectiveness of watercourse restoration and identified the likely origin of recolonising individuals. We found no significant barrier effect of the highway construction on gene flow. However, these encouraging results should be interpreted with caution, considering the likely time-lag in populations' responses to genetic drift effects. We observed a gradual recolonisation of restored watercourses that had undergone compensatory measures, suggesting positive effects of reproductive habitat recovery. Recolonisation involved nearby populations but also long-distance dispersal events occurring overland. Detected migrant individuals may come from geographically distant populations belonging to a different watercourse. This mirrors a migrant-pool model of colonisation that leaves high levels of genetic diversity and no evident spatial patterns in populations located close to the highway. Altogether, our study highlights both the potential and limitations of genetic tools to assess the impacts of linear infrastructure on gene flow and for understanding watercourse recolonisation processes after ecological management restoration.
Identifiers
42576050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.