Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576049›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Backward scrunching: planarians escape from noxious stimuli, cannibalism, and predation.

Liesel Blau, Hannah Poon, Nayana S Tellakula, Katherine C Hallmark, Erin Szuromi, Evangeline Coffinas, William B Kristan, Eva-Maria S Collins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liesel Blau *Biology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America.
Hannah Poon *Department of Physics and Astronomy, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America.
Nayana S TellakulaNeurobiology Department, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Katherine C HallmarkBiology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America.
Erin SzuromiBiology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America.
Evangeline CoffinasBiology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America.
William B KristanNeurobiology Department, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Eva-Maria S CollinsBiology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States of America. ecollin3@swarthmore.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-7042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals have evolved escape behaviors to survive. Freshwater planarians have many predators, including conspecifics in cannibalistic species such as Dugesia japonica. When agitated, planarians escape via a locomotory behavior called "scrunching", whereby the planarian periodically elongates and contracts its whole body. Current understanding is that planarians move forward when they scrunch. However, when transversely cutting D. japonica, we observed that while head pieces scrunched forward, tail pieces scrunched backward instead. Previous work has shown that forward scrunching is a conserved planarian escape behavior in response to transection and adverse stimuli such as low pH, noxious heat, hydrogen peroxide, and allyl isothiocyanate. Testing these stimuli, we found that backward scrunching is more difficult to induce than forward scrunching in both intact planarians and pieces. Using electrostimulation, we show that behavior progresses with increasing voltage from turning to backward scrunching to flailing when stimulated anteriorly, demonstrating that backward scrunching is a response to moderately strong stimuli. Moreover, we show that tail pieces - originating from transection or asexual reproduction (fission) - exhibit backward scrunching when attacked by intact planarians. Backward scrunching and backward steps of tail pieces were also observed when worms were bitten into pieces by dragonfly or damselfly nymphs, natural predators of planarians. The survival of tail pieces after fission is necessary for the expansion of asexual planarian populations. Thus, we propose that backward scrunching serves as an effective escape behavior to protect planarian tails from being eaten.

Indexed as

BehaviorDugesia japonicaElectrostimulationHeatLocomotionSchmidtea mediterraneaTransectionTRP

Identifiers

PMID42576049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.