ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Backward scrunching: planarians escape from noxious stimuli, cannibalism, and predation.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals have evolved escape behaviors to survive. Freshwater planarians have many predators, including conspecifics in cannibalistic species such as Dugesia japonica. When agitated, planarians escape via a locomotory behavior called "scrunching", whereby the planarian periodically elongates and contracts its whole body. Current understanding is that planarians move forward when they scrunch. However, when transversely cutting D. japonica, we observed that while head pieces scrunched forward, tail pieces scrunched backward instead. Previous work has shown that forward scrunching is a conserved planarian escape behavior in response to transection and adverse stimuli such as low pH, noxious heat, hydrogen peroxide, and allyl isothiocyanate. Testing these stimuli, we found that backward scrunching is more difficult to induce than forward scrunching in both intact planarians and pieces. Using electrostimulation, we show that behavior progresses with increasing voltage from turning to backward scrunching to flailing when stimulated anteriorly, demonstrating that backward scrunching is a response to moderately strong stimuli. Moreover, we show that tail pieces - originating from transection or asexual reproduction (fission) - exhibit backward scrunching when attacked by intact planarians. Backward scrunching and backward steps of tail pieces were also observed when worms were bitten into pieces by dragonfly or damselfly nymphs, natural predators of planarians. The survival of tail pieces after fission is necessary for the expansion of asexual planarian populations. Thus, we propose that backward scrunching serves as an effective escape behavior to protect planarian tails from being eaten.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42576049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.