Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576048›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Courtship at reaching-range in the túngara frog.

Olivia R Chung, Marcos Gridi-Papp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivia R ChungDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, 95211, USA.
Marcos Gridi-PappDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, 95211, USA. mgridipapp@pacific.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-7510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Courtship in frogs can mediate the final approach between the sexes before amplexus and spawning. It can involve male and female calling, touching, and guidance to the spawning site. Courtship behaviors have been described for several species in nature but little experimentation has been done to uncover the biological mechanisms that control them. We characterized the close-range courtship (within 10 cm) interactions in the túngara frog, an emerging model organism, to provide a quantitative baseline in a neutral arena in support of future experiments. In this initial assessment, we isolated each pair to examine only the social stimulation that is intrinsic to the pair. Among 81 pairs, 80% entered amplexus and of those 57% laid eggs. Males called before amplexus in 86% of the trials in spite of the female's proximity. The female was inferred to execute the final approach before amplexus in 79% of the events. Egg laying was concentrated in the period 6-8 h after sunset and it could be followed by calling. Multiple bouts of egg nest building were observed in 1/4 of the trials and physical contact other than amplexus was common. Male strategy, the last approach before amplexus, and egg laying were not influenced by age or body size but females with high body condition were more likely to lay eggs. Our data revealed that courtship in the túngara frog is not necessarily terminated when the male is approached by the female, but additional close-range interactions may mediate the onset of amplexus and reproductive success.

Indexed as

AnuraCourtshipSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleVocalization, AnimalAdvertisement callAmphibiaAmplexusBreedingCallingCommunication

Identifiers

PMID42576048
PMCPMC13642479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.