Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576047›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

A somatosensory fovea in the fingertips of the Surinam toad.

Christopher J Meredith, Rebeca W Fuquen, Sophia Manfrey, Penelope Chai, Duncan B Leitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher J MeredithDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5248-5977
Rebeca W FuquenDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-3746
Sophia ManfreyDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Penelope ChaiDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Duncan B LeitchDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. dleitch@ucla.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-888X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Surinam toad (Pipa pipa) is a fully aquatic, tongueless pipid frog that captures prey using rapid suction feeding coordinated by the forelimbs. The digit tips bear distinctive lobed structures whose function has been unknown. Here we characterize the morphology, mechanical sensitivity, peripheral innervation, central representation, and behavioral function of these digit tip lobes using scanning electron microscopy, von Frey threshold measurements, in vivo electrophysiology of the brachial nerve and optic tectum, and high-speed video analysis (1000 fps). SEM reveals a progressive quadrification yielding 128 terminal lobules per frog, bearing dome-shaped papillae at 142 ± 18/mm

Indexed as

AnuraForelimbMechanoreceptorsAnimalsMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSuperior ColliculiCortical magnificationMechanoreceptionOptic tectumPipa pipaSomatosensory foveaSuction feeding

Identifiers

PMID42576047
PMCPMC13642415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.