ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Light adaptation of the microvillus refractory period in blow fly photoreceptors.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of flash-induced quantum bumps (QB) recorded in vivo from photoreceptors of the blow fly Protophormia terraenovae, which were light-adapted by stimuli of varying duration and intensity, revealed that a subset of trials contained a secondary QB-like transient occurring after the primary QB. By averaging traces with onset-aligned light-induced QBs, we discovered secondary signals with the following properties: (1) The relative magnitude of the secondary signal increased with both the intensity and the duration of the adapting stimulus. The secondary signal was absent in dark-adapted photoreceptors, but following bright 10 s adapting pulses its size approached ~ 40% of the primary QB. (2) The interval between the peaks of the primary QB and the secondary signal decreased with increasing adaptation: from ~ 100 ms in minimally light-adapted photoreceptors to ~ 40 ms after the strongest stimulation. (3) The larger was the secondary signal, the sooner it appeared after the primary QB. (4) Following strong light adaptation, in five experiments we observed two and in one experiment three evenly spaced secondary peaks with progressively decreasing amplitudes. Together, these observations indicate that the secondary signal likely represents a QB arising from incomplete termination of phototransduction in some microvilli during strong light stimulation. The systematic, strong shortening of the secondary peak interval with increased adaptation implies that the microvillus refractory period in P. terraenovae is itself subject to light adaptation. Because refractory period shortening increases the pool of microvilli available for transduction, this effect would raise the effective signal-to-noise ratio of the photoreceptor in bright light.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42576046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.