ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Prevalence and risk factors of bone fragility in duchenne muscular dystrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Prevalence and relative risk of fractures and osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disorder that is due to mutations in the dystrophin gene which encodes the dystrophin protein. Many patients face an increased risk of bone fragility and develop secondary osteoporosis as a result of the combined effects of progressive muscle weakness, immobilization, and the osteotoxic properties of glucocorticoids (GCs). The present study showed that the prevalence of low BMD and fracture in DMD patients reached as high as 0.62 and 0.38, respectively, with contributing risk factors extending beyond GCs and loss of ambulation to include older age, vitamin D deficiency, fat mass accumulation, and hormonal imbalances. Therefore, clinical trials of bone-protective therapies and strategies to improve bone health in boys with DMD are urgently warranted. PURPOSE: Poor skeletal health, characterized by rapid bone mineral density decline, causes substantial morbidity in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review comprehensive findings on the prevalence and risk factors of low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in DMD.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting prevalence of fractures, low BMD, or data on risk factors in DMD patients. Random‑effects meta‑analyses estimated pooled prevalence of low BMD and fractures. Subgroup analyses examined variations by region, GCs use, fracture location, and ambulatory stage.
resultsA total of 43 studies involving 4940 patients were reviewed. The prevalence of low BMD from 0.16 to 0.93, with an overall prevalence of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.79). Fracture prevalence spanned from 0.07 to 0.87, yielding a pooled estimate of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43). North America had the highest fracture prevalence at 0.47 (95% CI, 0.39-0.56), followed by Oceania at 0.47 (95% CI, 0.40-0.54), Europe at 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.37), and Asia at the lowest 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.27). Fracture prevalence was higher in glucocorticoids (GCs)-treated patients (0.39 vs. 0.23 in non-GCs) and increased with longer GCs duration, being 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.35) for 3 years, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.24-0.43) for 3-6 years, and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42-0.75) for ≥ 6 years of GCs exposure. Bone fragility in DMD is driven by multifactorial risk factors, with contributors extending beyond GCs use and loss of ambulation to include older age, vitamin D deficiency, fat mass accumulation, and hormonal imbalances.
conclusionLow BMD and fractures are highly prevalent globally in DMD, with bone fragility driven by multifactorial mechanisms. These findings may inform the design of clinical trials for bone-protective therapies and strategies to improve bone strength in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42576024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.