Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42575948›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Early reduction of forced-air warming temperature can reduce energy consumption during craniotomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Anselm Bräuer, Julian Manuel Willrodt, Alexandra-Cristina Popescu, Thaddäus Struk, Johannes Wieditz, Leif Saager, Peter Michels

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anselm BräuerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. abraeue@gwdg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4013-8755
Julian Manuel WillrodtDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Alexandra-Cristina PopescuDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Thaddäus StrukDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Johannes WieditzDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Leif SaagerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Peter MichelsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their well-known efficacy, forced-air warming during operations has its drawbacks, mainly high energy consumption and risk of hyperthermia. We therefore investigated two warming strategies in a prospective randomized study with the aim of reducing the incidence of hyperthermia without increasing the risk of intraoperative hypothermia. In the standard of care group temperature of the forced-air warmer was reduced to 32 °C when core temperature reached 37.3 °C. In the modified warming group this reduction was performed when core temperature reached 36.5 °C. The difference in the duration of normothermia between standard of care and the modified warming strategy was estimated to be 3.9% (90%-CI: 0.8% to 7.1%) and was within the predefined equivalence bounds of ± 20% (p < 0.001). In both treatment groups no intraoperative hyperthermia ocurred. Average energy consumption per hour was significantly higher in the standard-of-care group (0.51 kWh/h; 95%-CI: 0.47-0.56) compared with the modified warming strategy (0.40 kWh/h; 95%-CI: 0.35-0.46; p = 0.002). By strictly limiting the heat supply, intraoperative hyperthermia can be safely prevented during craniotomies. A lower threshold value of 36.5 °C allows for a meaningful reduction in energy consumption.

Indexed as

CraniotomyEnergy MetabolismHyperthermiaBody TemperatureFemaleHumansHypothermiaMaleProspective StudiesTemperatureThermal ComfortAnesthesiaBody temperatureEnergy consumptionHyperthermiaNoiseWarming strategy

Identifiers

PMID42575948
PMCPMC13458725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.