Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42575942›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Explainability-driven adaptive cyber deception control system for autonomous network defense.

Shreyashi Deb Roy, Ganesh Khekare, Sejal Chhajed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreyashi Deb RoySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ganesh KhekareSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. ganesh.khekare@vit.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-1687-4699
Sejal ChhajedSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing sophistication of cyber threats has led to the identification of some major shortcomings associated with honeypots, which include staticness, inflexibility, and vulnerability to fingerprinting. The proposed work aims at overcoming the aforementioned shortcomings by creating an Explainability-Driven Adaptive Cyber Deception Control System capable of engaging in intelligent, interactive interactions with cyber attackers. The key goal of the proposed solution is to improve threat intelligence gathering and deception efficiency by leveraging the benefits of adaptability and explainability. Machine learning, XAI, behavioral profiling, and environment mutation are the four key components that form the backbone of the proposed pipeline system. A Random Forest classifier is used for classification of normal and malicious sessions based on behavioral features at the level of commands. An explainability-driven metric known as the Feature Dominance Deception Index (FDDI) is developed to guide deception approaches, whereas Behavioral Convergence Score (BCS) is considered to assess behavioral convergence of attackers. Intent recognition using kill chain methodology allows generating responses in context-dependent fashion, while the mutation engine creates unique environments in each session to prevent fingerprinting attacks. Furthermore, Reinforcement Learning (RL) layer based on Q-learning is added to the framework to adaptively make decisions by learning the best possible deception tactics over multiple sessions. The Deception Quality Score (DQS) metric is used to measure the quality of deception within each session. Moreover, the UNSW-NB15 network intrusion data set is employed for validating the proposed model. Through benchmarking based on the generated behavioral dataset, the Random Forest-based behavioral profiler yielded a classification accuracy of 90.0%, recall of 85.7%, and an F1-score of 92.3%. Thereafter, the end-to-end deployment of the proposed framework through Cowrie honeypot sessions yielded better deception effectiveness, giving a framework-level attack classification accuracy of 90.0% and a 77.0% improvement in threat intelligence extraction per session than baseline Cowrie deployment. Kill chain stages were identified for the evaluated cases, deception goals were accomplished for all sessions under testing, fingerprinting efforts by the attacker were unsuccessful, and high-quality deception was maintained. The reward per session for the RL agent ranges from + 0 to + 14.0 for different session types, resulting in the formation of a converged Q-table containing values of 21 out of 90 possible states. Additionally, the technique ensures the resistance against honeypot fingerprinting, and demonstrates resistance against evaluated fingerprinting attempts. As far as it is currently known, few previous works can be found which have managed to include explainable scoring, convergence of behavior analysis, adaptive control, environment mutation, and reinforcement learning into one cyber deception framework. The presented framework manages to incorporate all of these features while still preserving transparency and adaptability during the whole process of deception. The research makes advances in the current state-of-the-art research by enabling passive honeypots to become intelligent autonomous systems for detecting cyber threats.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityDeceptionAdaptive AlgorithmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestReinforcement Machine LearningSoft ComputingAdaptive security systemsBehavioral analysisBehavioral convergence score (BCS)Cyber deceptionCyber kill chainExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Feature dominance deception index (FDDI)Honeypot systemsThreat intelligence

Identifiers

PMID42575942
PMCPMC13458077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.