Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42575939›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Reassurance through normalization inadvertently suppresses treatment.

Seyi Lawal, Brianna Chew, On Amir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyi LawalRady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Seyi.Lawal@rady.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9739-8781
Brianna ChewRady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-8953
On AmirRady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One way in which healthcare providers communicate reassurance is by informing patients when their symptoms are normal, either for a particular life stage (for example, menopause) or health context (for example, postprocedural pain). Although reassurance aims to reduce anxiety and bolster self-efficacy, which are factors that generally facilitate action, our results suggest that normalization can paradoxically have the opposite effect, reducing people's inclination to pursue treatment. A total of 14 studies (n = 9,371) document this phenomenon, including when and why it occurs. Here we find that normalization triggers a reappraisal of treatment norms, where people infer that their healthcare provider is normalizing their symptoms to communicate that treatment is not warranted. As this is typically not providers' intention, we also identify communication strategies to overcome this faulty inference. While these experiments demonstrate a consistent effect across many samples, they should be interpreted in light of the experiments being conducted online, rather than in a clinical setting.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.