Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42575937›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Hierarchical resource rationality explains human reading behaviour.

Yunpeng Bai, Xiaofu Jin, Shengdong Zhao, Antti Oulasvirta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunpeng BaiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7578-0079
Xiaofu JinDepartment of Information and Communications Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Shengdong ZhaoSchool of Creative Media, Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7971-3107
Antti OulasvirtaDepartment of Information and Communications Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. antti.oulasvirta@aalto.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-7837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading is a pervasive and cognitively demanding activity that underpins modern human culture. It is a prime instance of a class of tasks where eye movements are coordinated for the purpose of comprehension. Existing theories explain either eye movements or comprehension during reading, but the critical link between the two remains unclear. Here we propose resource-rational optimization as a unifying control principle governing adaptive reading behaviour. Eye movements are selected to maximize expected comprehension while minimizing cognitive and temporal costs, organized hierarchically across nested time scales: fixation decisions support word recognition; sentence-level integration guides skipping and regression; and text-level comprehension goals shape memory construction and rereading. A computational implementation successfully replicates an unprecedented range of findings in human reading, from lexical effects to comprehension outcomes. Together, these results suggest that resource rationality provides a general mechanism for coordinating perception, memory and action in knowledge-intensive human behaviours, offering a principled account of how complex cognitive skills adapt to limited resources.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.