ArticleScientific reports2026
Palm oil fuel ash blended cement for solidification stabilization of petroleum sludge and heavy metal immobilization and waste valorization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The petroleum industry produces a significant quantity of solid waste referred to as petroleum sludge (PS) as a result of several refining, storage, and transportation procedures. PS typically contains a variety of heavy metals that could threat environment even to the human. Fortunately, PS can be effectively managed using a variety of treatment techniques. The solidification/stabilization (S/S) technique was applied to treat PS, with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) partially replaced by palm oil fuel ash (POFA). The study began with the characterisation of raw materials, including OPC, POFA, and PS, using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). POFA substitution levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% were evaluated for their effectiveness in encapsulating heavy metals within the cementitious matrix. Two leaching assessments were conducted: the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP). Heavy metal concentrations in the leachates were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). The results indicate that heavy metal concentrations decreased progressively with increasing POFA content up to 15%; a slight increase was observed at 20% substitution. All results were compared against USEPA regulatory guidelines, and the heavy metal concentrations in all treated samples complied with the applicable limits. The optimal POFA substitution level was 15%. The TCLP and SPLP results suggest that the treated material may warrant further investigation for potential reclassification from hazardous to non-hazardous waste; however, this conclusion requires validation through long-term durability assessment and compressive strength testing, which were not within the scope of the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.