ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatial interrelationships between flood risk and ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region at multiple scales.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Against the backdrop of global climate change and rapid urbanization, the coexistence of intensifying flood risk and ecosystem service degradation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region has emerged as a major constraint on regional sustainable development. This study develops an integrated framework of "multi-scale assessment-association analysis-mechanism exploration," and comprehensively applies the InVEST model, the RUSLE model, random forest algorithms, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and coupling coordination degree models to systematically investigate the complex relationships and scale effects between flood risk and key ecosystem services-namely water yield and soil conservation-in the BTH region. The results indicate that: (1) the spatial patterns of both flood risk and ecosystem services exhibit pronounced scale dependence, with high-risk areas concentrated in piedmont plains and urban built-up zones, while high ecosystem service areas are stably distributed within the Yanshan and Taihang ecological barrier regions, resulting in a clear spatial mismatch characterized by "high risk-low service"; (2) the relationship between water yield service and flood risk demonstrates a scale reversal, shifting from a weak negative correlation at the micro-scale to a significant positive correlation at meso- and macro-scales, whereas soil conservation service consistently exhibits a stable negative correlation with flood risk at meso- and macro-scales, with the strength of this relationship increasing with scale; and (3) bivariate spatial analysis identifies spatial synergy zones of "high water yield-high flood risk" and spatial trade-off zones of "high soil conservation-low flood risk," while coupling coordination degree assessment reveals the coexistence of coordinated and maladjusted states across the region, with relatively poorer coordination between soil conservation and flood risk. From a multi-scale perspective, this study deepens the understanding of the coupling mechanisms between flood risk and ecosystem services, and provides a scientific basis for ecological restoration, resilient urban planning, and coordinated watershed governance in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.