Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42575888›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

How carbon accounting rules shape incentives for hydrogen production.

Gunther Glenk, Philip Holler, Stefan Reichelstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gunther GlenkBusiness School, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. glenk@uni-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-838X
Philip HollerBusiness School, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. philip.holler@uni-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-9807
Stefan ReichelsteinBusiness School, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-6715

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 403041268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governments around the world have recently adopted policy support programs for hydrogen, tying the level of support to the assessed carbon intensity of the hydrogen produced. Here we compare alternative carbon accounting rules for determining the policy support available for hydrogen in terms of the resulting financial and carbon emissions performance of Power-to-Gas systems. We calibrate our model to reference plants eligible for the production tax credit available under the Inflation Reduction Act in the United States. Contrary to frequently articulated views, more stringent accounting rules generally provide investors with sufficient incentives to invest in Power-to-Gas systems. Nonetheless, even more stringent rules can lead to carbon intensity levels close to those for hydrogen produced from natural gas with carbon capture. Less stringent rules generally entail stronger investment incentives due to higher profitability, but also significantly higher emissions as investors procure more carbon-intensive electricity from the general grid.

Identifiers

PMID42575888
PMCPMC13457867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.