ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2026
Feasibility, Affordability, Benefits, and Challenges of Transitioning to Virtual Case Management for PLHIV: Experiences From Indonesia and Nepal.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHIV case management supports people living with HIV to be linked to and retained in care. HIV case management becomes virtual case management (VCM) when some or all these services are provided via virtual tools or platforms including mobile phones, chat messenger apps, other mobile or web apps, and/or electronic case management systems. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use and expansion of virtual services, including health services, across the globe. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: These case studies document how HIV programs in Indonesia and Nepal transitioned from in-person case management to VCM during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. As part of this transition, the program in Nepal implemented VCM in 37 districts that were providing services to 12,820 people living with HIV (PLHIV), and in Indonesia the program supported 18,244 PLHIV in 5 districts. Data on the transition from in-person support to VCM were collected on client clinical outcomes, costs of the virtual services, and case manager feedback.
resultsThese case studies indicate that VCM is a feasible and affordable approach to implement in low- and middle-income country contexts. Between March and September 2020, 10,995 (82.1%) and 3,801 (51.5%) PLHIV in Nepal and Indonesia, respectively, were supported by VCM. Continuity of care remained high in both countries with only 1%-2% interruptions in treatment. Viral load suppression also remained high in both countries (91%-92% in Indonesia and 94%-95% in Nepal). Viral load coverage, however, was low, but this was influenced by clinic and laboratory closures. Startup costs were low (<US$2,500), and the monthly cost per person to provide VCM was $2.34 in Nepal and $4.67 in Indonesia. Case manager feedback was focused on compensation, expanded reach of virtual services, gaps in client mobile phone ownership or digital literacy, efficiency of services, and confidentiality and privacy.
conclusionVCM has transformative potential to expand the reach of health services and provide differentiated options, meeting clients' preferences and needs. The experiences and lessons learned from these two case studies can guide the implementation of future VCM programs in other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.