ArticleBMJ mental health2026
BLACK-ARTS: a qualitative study exploring the insights of black young people with psychiatric disorders and the uses of creative arts therapies to improve mental well-being.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlack people experience persistent inequalities in mental health outcomes, access and care quality compared with their white counterparts. These disparities are compounded by structural racism and a lack of culturally competent care within National Health Service (NHS) services. Creative arts therapies (CATs), including music, art, dance and drama therapy, may offer culturally relevant, non-verbal approaches to mental health support for this population.
objectiveTo explore how black young people with mental health challenges and NHS clinicians perceive the usefulness and cultural relevance of CATs and to examine their potential as culturally competent interventions for improving mental well-being.
methodsA qualitative, multicentre study was conducted across five NHS Trusts in England. 20 black service users (aged 16-24) and 15 clinicians participated in 10 online focus groups (45-60 min each). Transcripts were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis method constructed with NVivo V.12 software. Coding was led by the first author, with regular discussions with a second researcher to refine interpretations and develop themes.
findingsFive overarching themes were identified: (1) creative arts as vehicles for emotional healing, identity and agency, (2) challenges and barriers to CAT implementation, (3) disconnection and mistrust within clinical encounters, (4) discovering therapeutic potential through creative experience and (5) creative expression as a bridge between culture and care. Participants viewed CATs as emotionally regulating, accessible and aligned with black cultural identity though limited by underfunding, stigma and insufficient cultural competence within the NHS.
conclusionsCATs may provide a culturally congruent and emotionally accessible approach to mental healthcare for black youth. Embedding culturally competent, creative modalities within NHS pathways could enhance engagement, trust and equity in service outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CATs should be integrated early in NHS pathways (eg, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Talking Therapies) to improve engagement among black youth who may be hesitant to engage in verbally dominant therapies. However, scaled implementation requires meaningful coproduction with black communities, cultural competence training for multidisciplinary teams and recognition within NHS and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.