ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Mechanistic diversity of clamp loading at small DNA gaps.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA sliding clamps, including PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and the 9-1-1 (RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 in humans) complex, are ring-shaped protein complexes that encircle DNA and serve as central interaction platforms in DNA replication, repair, and checkpoint signaling. While clamp loading at canonical primer-template junctions by AAA+ (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities) clamp loaders is well established, how clamps are loaded onto physiologically relevant but geometrically constrained DNA intermediates, such as nicks and single-stranded gaps, has remained unclear. Recent cryo-electron microscopy studies reveal that clamp loaders have evolved distinct strategies to overcome these constraints and to specialize for different genomic contexts. At gapped DNA, the eukaryotic clamp loader RFC (replication factor C) engages both 3'- and 5'-recessed DNA ends and can locally unwind DNA, enabling PCNA loading across a wide range of gap sizes. In contrast, the bacterial DnaX clamp loader lacks a 5'-DNA-binding site and does not unwind DNA, instead loading the β-clamp at small gaps (<6 nt) by sharply bending DNA. The checkpoint clamp loader Rad24-RFC (RAD17-RFC in humans) similarly lacks DNA unwinding activity, restricting loading of 9-1-1 clamp to larger gaps (≥6 nt). In a distinct specialization, Ctf18-RFC interacts with the leading-strand DNA polymerase ε, positioning it as a dedicated loader for leading-strand synthesis, whereas Elg1-RFC (ATAD5-RFC in humans) excludes DNA from its chamber and functions as a PCNA unloader. Together, these mechanisms illustrate how clamp loaders are diversified to accommodate DNA structure and replisome context, ensuring coordinated control of genome replication and maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.