ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2026
Phenotype-Specific Associations between Graft‑Versus‑Host Disease and Post‑Transplant Outcomes.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disease relapse remains the leading cause of failure following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). As novel prophylactic strategies increasingly aim to universally eliminate all forms of graft‑versus‑host disease (GVHD), how these approaches may inadvertently sacrifice graft‑versus‑leukemia activity in the post‑transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) era is unclear. To evaluate the associations between time‑updated GVHD phenotypes and clinical outcomes, including relapse, non‑relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS), in patients undergoing PTCy‑based haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT. This was a retrospective cohort study using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Participants included 7055 patients with hematologic malignancies who received a first haploidentical or MMUD HCT with PTCy from 2013 to 2021. Associations with relapse, NRM, and OS were evaluated using multi‑state time‑dependent Cox proportional hazards models and a multi‑state random survival forest (MS‑RSF). Time‑updated acute and chronic GVHD phenotypes included isolated Grade II acute GVHD (aGVHD), Grade III to IV aGVHD, mild chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and immunosuppressive therapy-requiring (IST‑requiring) cGVHD. IST‑requiring cGVHD without antecedent aGVHD was associated with a lower modeled relapse hazard compared with remaining GVHD‑free (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.89; false discovery rate-adjusted P [q] = 0.006) and lower overall mortality (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.73; q < 0.001). In contrast, Grade III to IV aGVHD was associated with significantly higher modeled NRM (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.57 to 3.84; q < 0.001). Mild cGVHD and isolated Grade II aGVHD showed intermediate patterns without consistent associations. These associations were directionally consistent across multiple analytic approaches, including standard time‑dependent Cox regression, dynamic and fixed landmark analyses, and MS‑RSF. In this large PTCy‑treated mismatched donor cohort, IST‑requiring cGVHD was the GVHD phenotype most consistently associated with lower relapse incidence, whereas severe aGVHD was associated with higher NRM. These findings highlight heterogeneity in GVHD phenotypes and suggest that strategies distinguishing toxic aGVHD from chronic alloreactivity patterns may better balance morbidity and long‑term disease control. Given that relapse remains the predominant cause of post‑transplant mortality, approaches aiming to universally eliminate all GVHD warrant careful reconsideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.