ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Dysphagia Variabilities and Identification in the Primary Care Setting.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionPublic and clinical awareness of dysphagia remains low, leading to under-diagnosis and delayed treatment. This study investigates the utility of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) as a proactive screening instrument for dysphagia in outpatient settings.MethodsObservational, cohort study from 121 adult outpatients undergoing instrumental swallowing evaluations. Participants self-administered the EAT-10 prior to their instrumental assessment.ResultsSelf-reported swallowing difficulty via EAT-10 scores significantly correlates with objectively measured dysphagia severity. Patients who remained on a regular diet following swallowing evaluation had significantly lower average EAT-10 scores than those who were recommended for diet modifications based on dysphagia severity (13.0 vs. 26.1,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.