ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Comprehensive social determinants of health and brain health in midlife.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as important drivers of cognitive outcomes. However, most existing evidence focuses on individual SDOH components and older populations.
objectivesTo develop a comprehensive SDOH index and examine its association with subsequent changes in cognitive function and structural brain measures in midlife.
designProspective cohort study with repeated measures of cognition and brain imaging.
settingCommunity-based cohort from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.
participantsA total of 3488 participants with SDOH data in early midlife (mean age 40.0 ± 3.6 years); 645 participants had repeated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. MEASUREMENTS: A weighted aggregate SDOH index was constructed from 12 items across 5 domains: economic stability, community and social context, education, neighborhood and built environment, and health care access. Cognitive function was assessed using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop Test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Brain MRI outcomes included white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and total gray matter (GM) volume. Mixed linear regression models examined associations between SDOH quartiles and longitudinal cognitive and MRI outcomes, adjusting for demographics, vascular risk factors, depression, and intracranial volume (for MRI).
resultsAt baseline, participants in the most disadvantaged SDOH quartile performed worse across all cognitive tests compared with the least disadvantaged quartile (p < 0.001). Over time, the most disadvantaged quartile showed steeper decline in DSST performance (adj. mean change: -0.72, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.52 vs. -0.55, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.34, p = 0.013), greater WMH accumulation (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.09 vs. 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.05, p = 0.007), and steeper decline in total GM volume (-2.02 cm³, 95% CI: -2.39 to -1.65 vs. -1.46 cm³, 95% CI: -1.71 to -1.20, p = 0.011) per 5-year interval compared to the least disadvantaged quartile.
conclusionsGreater social disadvantage in midlife is associated with worse baseline cognition and accelerated decline in cognitive function and brain integrity. These findings highlight the importance of SDOH as key determinants of brain health in midlife and suggest that strategies to mitigate social disadvantage may help preserve cognitive and brain health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.