Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574707›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Home Visits as a Primary Health Care Strategy During COVID-19: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Woska Pires da Costa, Heloísa de Carvalho Torres, Ana Paula Santana Coelho Almeida, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Ana Cecília Oliveira Costa, Eugênia Aparecida Portes, Anny Tristão Vimercati, Vitória Andrade Rodrigues Moreira, Thiago Dias Sarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Woska Pires da CostaResearch Department, Instituto Federal Goiano - Campus Morrinhos, BR-153 Highway, Km 633, P.O. Box 92, Rural Area, Morrinhos, GO, 75658-899, Brazil, 55 64992227424.ORCID 0000-0002-8841-2039
Heloísa de Carvalho TorresNucleus for Education and Applied Research in Primary Health Care (NEAPS), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-3937
Ana Paula Santana Coelho AlmeidaNucleus for Education and Applied Research in Primary Health Care (NEAPS), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5808-5818
Luiz Carlos de AbreuMedical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-2109
Ana Cecília Oliveira CostaNucleus for Education and Applied Research in Primary Health Care (NEAPS), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9663-7070
Eugênia Aparecida PortesNucleus for Education and Applied Research in Primary Health Care (NEAPS), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4187-3476
Anny Tristão VimercatiPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-9690-2659
Vitória Andrade Rodrigues MoreiraPostgraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-3427-8371
Thiago Dias SartiNucleus for Education and Applied Research in Primary Health Care (NEAPS), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-6276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary health care played a critical role during the COVID-19 pandemic by adapting care delivery to maintain essential services and reduce transmission risks. Home visits were used to monitor individuals in isolation, support vulnerable populations at increased risk, and sustain community-based care. However, their organization and operationalization varied across settings, and the available evidence remains fragmented. Objective: This protocol outlines the methods for a scoping review that will systematically map how in-person or hybrid home visits linked to primary, community-based, or first-contact care were organized and operationalized during the COVID-19 response, including the operational approaches, reported outcomes, and remaining knowledge gaps. Methods: This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) statement. Eligibility was defined using the Population, Concept, and Context framework. Searches will be conducted in seven electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and LILACS) without language restrictions and will include eligible studies published from 2020 onward. Conditional supplementary procedures may include backward citation searching and citation mapping of included studies and relevant reviews, as well as targeted searches and limited gray literature searching, if database searches yield limited evidence or leave relevant questions insufficiently represented. Records will be managed in Rayyan. Two reviewers will independently assess eligibility, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. All included sources will undergo descriptive mapping. Operational configurations will be classified by provider configuration, delivery modality, and targeting logic. Basic qualitative content analysis will be limited to explicitly reported implementation experiences, barriers, facilitators, contextual adaptations, and recommendations. Results: Pilot searches were conducted solely to assess feasibility and refine the search strategy; formal searching, screening, data extraction, and synthesis have not yet begun. The review will commence after acceptance of the protocol and is expected to be completed within approximately 6 months. Conclusions: The review will provide a structured evidence map of home-visit practices during the COVID-19 response and may identify transferable operational lessons and evidence gaps relevant to preparedness for future public health emergencies. Reported outcomes will not be interpreted as evidence of comparative effectiveness or causal effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19House CallsPrimary Health CareHumansPandemicsResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2Scoping Reviews as Topiccommunity health servicesCOVID-19family health teamshome-based careprimary health strategypublic health emergenciespublic health systemscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42574707
PMCPMC13457179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.