ArticleNursing open2026
Self-Regulated Learning and Perceived Clinical Stressors in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine the relationship between self-regulated learning and perceived clinical stressors among undergraduate nursing students engaged in clinical education.
designA descriptive and correlational cross-sectional study.
methodsThe study was conducted with 223 undergraduate nursing students enrolled at a public university during the 2022-2023 academic year. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Self-Regulated Learning Scale for Clinical Nursing Practices and the Nursing Students' Perceptions of Clinical Stressors Scale. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, Spearman's correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis.
resultsNursing students reported relatively high levels of both self-regulated learning and perceived clinical stressors. Students who had voluntarily chosen the nursing profession demonstrated higher self-regulated learning scores than those who had not. Perceived clinical stressor scores differed according to gender, academic year and perceived academic achievement. A weak positive association was identified between self-regulated learning and perceived clinical stressors. However, after adjustment for gender, academic year and academic achievement in the multiple linear regression analysis, self-regulated learning was not an independent predictor of perceived clinical stress. These findings suggest that self-regulated learning and clinical stress represent interconnected aspects of nursing students' clinical learning experiences, although self-regulated learning was not an independent predictor of perceived clinical stress after adjustment for potential confounding variables. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? ○ Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between self-regulated learning and perceived clinical stressors among undergraduate nursing students in clinical education settings. What were the main findings? ○ Nursing students reported high levels of both self-regulated learning and perceived clinical stressors, and a weak positive association was observed between these constructs. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○ The findings may inform nurse educators, curriculum planners and academic institutions in designing educational approaches that simultaneously support learning regulation and student well-being during clinical training. REPORTING
methodSTROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution. Nursing students participated only as study respondents and were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.