ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Toward reliable machine learning models for neural circuit inference: A diagnostic study of CNNs on spike trains.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding neuronal topology-how neurons are connected-is essential for uncovering neural computation principles and functional organization. However, accurately reconstructing such connectivity remains challenging due to the indirect nature of neural recordings and the complexity of network dynamics. As a first step towards this problem, a growing body of work has explored inferring monosynaptic connectivity directly from spike data. Among these, convolutional neural networks have shown promise when applied to spike-train cross-correlograms. Nevertheless, their ability to generalize across realistic experimental variability and the internal features that drive their predictions remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a systematic benchmarking and diagnostic study of neural-network-based synaptic inference using simulations across a broad range of biophysical regimes. We show that connectivity classification and synaptic weight estimation, though often combined, rely on distinct internal representations and exhibit markedly different generalization behavior: robust connectivity models emphasize global structure in spike-train correlations, whereas weight estimation models are more sensitive to local signal amplitude and generalize less predictably. Importantly, we find that training on pooled, biologically grounded simulation data substantially improves robustness across parameter perturbations, outperforming models trained under narrow conditions. We further validate these findings in both simulated network data and an in vitro dataset from high‑density microelectrode array recordings with patch‑clamp‑verified ground‑truth connections. Models trained on diverse simulated circuits generalize effectively to novel network architectures and the experimental dataset. Together, these results demonstrate that incorporating biologically realistic diversity during training is critical for developing reliable machine-learning tools for large-scale synaptic inference from neural recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.