Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574490›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Toward reliable machine learning models for neural circuit inference: A diagnostic study of CNNs on spike trains.

Xiaoqian Sun, Hui Lu, Chen Zeng, Rahul Simha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoqian SunDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-7381
Hui LuThe GW Institute for Neuroscience, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Chen ZengDepartment of Physics, Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9862-277X
Rahul SimhaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Funding

Understanding the effects of motor learning in wild-type and Mecp2-deficient miceR01NS118197 · NINDS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Hui Lu · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding neuronal topology-how neurons are connected-is essential for uncovering neural computation principles and functional organization. However, accurately reconstructing such connectivity remains challenging due to the indirect nature of neural recordings and the complexity of network dynamics. As a first step towards this problem, a growing body of work has explored inferring monosynaptic connectivity directly from spike data. Among these, convolutional neural networks have shown promise when applied to spike-train cross-correlograms. Nevertheless, their ability to generalize across realistic experimental variability and the internal features that drive their predictions remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a systematic benchmarking and diagnostic study of neural-network-based synaptic inference using simulations across a broad range of biophysical regimes. We show that connectivity classification and synaptic weight estimation, though often combined, rely on distinct internal representations and exhibit markedly different generalization behavior: robust connectivity models emphasize global structure in spike-train correlations, whereas weight estimation models are more sensitive to local signal amplitude and generalize less predictably. Importantly, we find that training on pooled, biologically grounded simulation data substantially improves robustness across parameter perturbations, outperforming models trained under narrow conditions. We further validate these findings in both simulated network data and an in vitro dataset from high‑density microelectrode array recordings with patch‑clamp‑verified ground‑truth connections. Models trained on diverse simulated circuits generalize effectively to novel network architectures and the experimental dataset. Together, these results demonstrate that incorporating biologically realistic diversity during training is critical for developing reliable machine-learning tools for large-scale synaptic inference from neural recordings.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsConvolutional Neural NetworksMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID42574490
PMCPMC13475989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.