Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574470›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Neural encoding of pain is robust within but unstable between individuals.

Laura Tiemann, Felix S Bott, Elisabeth S May, Moritz M Nickel, Vanessa D Hohn, Cristina Gil Ávila, Nicolò Bruna, Paul Theo Zebhauser, Markus Ploner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura TiemannCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Felix S BottCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-3479
Elisabeth S MayCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Moritz M NickelCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-243X
Vanessa D HohnCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Cristina Gil ÁvilaCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Nicolò BrunaCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Paul Theo ZebhauserCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Markus PlonerCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-7170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of pain varies both within and between individuals, even when sensory input remains constant. Understanding how the brain encodes these intra- and inter-individual variations is central to elucidating the neural mechanisms of pain and to developing reliable brain-based markers for clinical use. Yet, previous findings have been inconsistent, and their robustness across time and populations remains unclear. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) in 161 healthy participants to re-investigate the neural patterns explaining intra- and inter-individual variations in the perception of brief painful stimuli independent of stimulus intensity. Using Bayesian multivariate multi-model regression, we related pain ratings to canonical EEG responses. To directly assess robustness, the experiment was repeated after 4 weeks in the same participants and replicated in an independent cohort (n = 111). Neural patterns associated with inter-individual differences in pain perception were repeatable over time but not replicable across cohorts. In contrast, neural patterns underlying intra-individual fluctuations were robust both over time and across cohorts. These findings indicate that within-person and between-person variability in pain perception is encoded by distinct neural patterns that differ fundamentally in their robustness. Furthermore, they show that brain-based markers are particularly suited for tracking intra-individual fluctuations of pain, while being less sensitive to inter-individual differences. More broadly, they highlight the importance of within-person approaches for advancing both mechanistic models of pain and the development of clinically useful biomarkers.

Indexed as

BrainPainPain PerceptionAdultBayes TheoremElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42574470
PMCPMC13475984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.