ArticlePLoS biology2026
Neural encoding of pain is robust within but unstable between individuals.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of pain varies both within and between individuals, even when sensory input remains constant. Understanding how the brain encodes these intra- and inter-individual variations is central to elucidating the neural mechanisms of pain and to developing reliable brain-based markers for clinical use. Yet, previous findings have been inconsistent, and their robustness across time and populations remains unclear. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) in 161 healthy participants to re-investigate the neural patterns explaining intra- and inter-individual variations in the perception of brief painful stimuli independent of stimulus intensity. Using Bayesian multivariate multi-model regression, we related pain ratings to canonical EEG responses. To directly assess robustness, the experiment was repeated after 4 weeks in the same participants and replicated in an independent cohort (n = 111). Neural patterns associated with inter-individual differences in pain perception were repeatable over time but not replicable across cohorts. In contrast, neural patterns underlying intra-individual fluctuations were robust both over time and across cohorts. These findings indicate that within-person and between-person variability in pain perception is encoded by distinct neural patterns that differ fundamentally in their robustness. Furthermore, they show that brain-based markers are particularly suited for tracking intra-individual fluctuations of pain, while being less sensitive to inter-individual differences. More broadly, they highlight the importance of within-person approaches for advancing both mechanistic models of pain and the development of clinically useful biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.