Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574466›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

An alignment-free strategy for circulating tumor DNA detection and tumor fraction estimation from whole-genome sequencing data.

Carmen Oroperv, Amanda Frydendahl, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Giovanni Santacatterina, Alice Antonello, Nicola Calonaci, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Giulio Caravagna, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen, Søren Besenbacher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carmen OropervDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7199-896X
Amanda FrydendahlDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tenna Vesterman HenriksenDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Giovanni SantacatterinaDepartment of Mathematics, Informatics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Italy.
Alice AntonelloDepartment of Mathematics, Informatics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Italy.
Nicola CalonaciDepartment of Mathematics, Informatics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Italy.
Mads Heilskov RasmussenDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Giulio CaravagnaDepartment of Mathematics, Informatics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Italy.
Claus Lindbjerg AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-2103
Søren BesenbacherDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-1738
IMPROVE-consortia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising biomarker for postoperative monitoring of cancer patients. Precise estimation of circulating tumor fraction is crucial for evaluating treatment effects and timely detection of disease recurrence. All current ctDNA detection methods that utilize whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data rely on the reference genome alignment of sequencing reads and often apply separate tools for detecting different variant types. However, various bioinformatic analysis confounders and the application of external variant calling tools could be avoided by analyzing k-mers from unaligned sequencing reads. While k-mer-based methods have successfully been applied for somatic variant validation and detection, the potential of k-mer-based ctDNA detection is unexplored. We have developed a tumor-informed alignment-free ctDNA detection tool called ctDNAmer that detects tumor-specific somatic variation directly from unaligned sequencing data by identifying k-mers unique to the tumor DNA. ctDNAmer detects variant information across the genome by comparing the primary tumor and germline WGS data and accounts for sample-specific germline variability and technical noise in the same framework. We tested the utility of ctDNAmer for tumor fraction estimation on postoperative plasma cfDNA WGS data (mean sequencing depth ~ 28x) from 90 stage III colorectal cancer patients with three years of follow-up. The tumor fraction (TF) estimates agreed with the available clinical information and ctDNA was detected in 77% (17/22) of recurring patients with a median lead time of 8 months compared to radiological imaging. We further validated ctDNAmer's tumor fraction estimates based on a comparison with the mean cfDNA allele frequencies of somatic clonal SNVs identified from aligned primary tumor sequencing data. The TF estimates showed a strong Pearson correlation of 0.897 with the mean allele frequencies and improved ctDNA detection results across samples with an AUC of 0.79 compared to 0.75 if the mean allele frequency of clonal mutations is used.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsWhole Genome SequencingBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID42574466
PMCPMC13485129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.