Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574452›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

SKIM: A fast sketching strategy integrated with model's dynamic-feedback for large-scale single-cell transcriptomic analysis.

Jiaxing Bai, Feng Zhou, Chongyang Tan, Yichun Gao, Yushuang He, Xiaobing Huang, Ying Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiaxing BaiDepartment of Automation, National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Big Data Intelligent Analysis and Decision, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Feng ZhouNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Chongyang TanNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yichun GaoDepartment of Automation, National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Big Data Intelligent Analysis and Decision, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yushuang HeDepartment of Automation, National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Big Data Intelligent Analysis and Decision, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiaobing HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fuzhou First Hospital Affiliated with Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Automation, National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Big Data Intelligent Analysis and Decision, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8766-5950

Funding

Fuzhou Inter-institutional Science and Technology Cooperation ProjectNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets poses analytical challenges, including computational burden raised by increasing data scale, and imbalances in cell population sizes. Dataset sketching mitigates these issues by selecting representative subsets that preserve biological signals. Existing sketching methods rely on geometric distances between transcriptomic expression profiles to select representative cells that cover the expression space. While effective at capturing global expression patterns, these methods are insensitive to local expression variations that encode multiscale transcriptomic differences. Moreover, by prioritizing maximal coverage of the expression space, these methods overselect peripheral cells, including rare and abnormal cells. To overcome these limitations, we propose SKIM, a fast SKetching strategy integrated with model's dynamic-feedback for large-scale single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Dynamic-feedback is defined as the sequence of reconstruction losses for each cell across training epochs, reflecting how the model progressively learns the transcriptomic expression profile. During training, as the model captures features from global expression patterns to local variations, dynamic-feedback from loss trajectories provides comprehensive multiscale views of the variation between cells. Based on dynamic-feedback, SKIM identifies and removes abnormal cells exhibiting unstable feedback patterns, and constructs sketches through clustering and size-aware sampling in the dynamic-feedback space, reducing data size while balancing cell populations. Across nine benchmark datasets, SKIM outperforms four state-of-the-art sketching methods in cell type annotation, data integration, bulk RNA-seq deconvolution, and developmental trajectory inference. Moreover, SKIM demonstrates high computational efficiency, achieving over a 20-fold speedup compared with existing methods when generating a 10% sketch from 216,611 cells. Overall, SKIM provides an efficient framework for large-scale dataset sketching that effectively retains critical biological signals while reducing computational burden.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID42574452
PMCPMC13485126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.