ArticlePloS one2026
FedMamba-IoMT: Federated state space models with differential privacy and byzantine resilience for privacy-preserving intrusion detection in Internet of Medical Things.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices has created critical cybersecurity challenges demanding intrusion detection systems that achieve high accuracy across diverse attack taxonomies while preserving patient privacy across institutional boundaries. Existing federated learning (FL) approaches face an inherent tension: Transformer-based architectures achieve strong detection performance but incur quadratic computational complexity and substantial communication overhead, while lightweight classifiers sacrifice representational capacity. Moreover, most FL-based intrusion detection systems lack formal privacy guarantees and robustness against adversarial participants. This paper introduces FedMamba-IoMT, the first federated State Space Model framework for privacy-preserving intrusion detection in IoMT networks, incorporating differential privacy (DP-SGD), Byzantine-resilient aggregation, and multi-level explainability. The proposed architecture reformulates tabular network traffic features as pseudo-sequential tokens processed through stacked selective State Space Model (Mamba) blocks with gated residual connections, achieving linear computational complexity 𝒪(n) with 78% fewer parameters than Transformer alternatives. We design a novel FedMamba aggregation strategy that weights client contributions by a convex combination of dataset proportion and inverse validation loss, augmented with a cosine similarity-based Byzantine filter that detects and excludes malicious model updates. Integration of DP-SGD with Rényi differential privacy accounting provides formal privacy guarantees (ε∈{1.0,2.0,3.0,5.0,8.0}, δ=10-5) while maintaining competitive accuracy. Comprehensive evaluation across three benchmark datasets-Edge-IIoTset (2,219,201 samples, 15 classes), CICIoMT2024 (3,204,537 samples, 19 classes), and Gotham Dataset 2025 (496,191 samples, 8 high-level traffic categories)-demonstrates that FedMamba-IoMT achieves 99.47±0.04%, 99.52±0.04%, and 98.90±0.04% multiclass accuracy without DP, and 98.52%, 98.18%, and 97.16% at ε=3.0, surpassing all prior federated IDS approaches. Byzantine resilience experiments demonstrate that the proposed defense maintains >95% accuracy under 30% malicious clients across label-flipping, model poisoning, and free-rider attacks. Gradient inversion analysis confirms that FedMamba's compact parameterization (135K parameters, 0.52 MB) provides 2× higher reconstruction error compared to Transformer-based FL, and the integrated SHAP and LIME explainability framework supports regulatory compliance with the FDA's 2023 cybersecurity guidance for medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.