ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluating the efficacy and specificity of PVPP for phenolic compound removal from natural organic matter.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental tests of the enzyme latch hypothesis frequently rely on the removal of phenolic compounds using the phenol binding agent polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), yet the extent to which PVP-based approaches alter the composition of the broader dissolved organic matter (DOM) pool remains poorly constrained. Here, we evaluated the selectivity of solid phase polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) using Suwannee River Fulvic Acid (SRFA) as a highly characterized representative DOM standard and, for the first time, combined bulk measurements of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and phenolic removal with Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) characterization of residual DOM before and after PVPP treatment. Phenolic binding efficiency increased systematically with PVPP amount and column conditioning, with a rehydrated 1.5 g PVPP-packed column reducing soluble phenolic concentrations by 91%, DOC by 61%, and C-normalized phenolic content from 21% to 5% of the DOM pool. FT-ICR MS analysis revealed that PVPP preferentially removed polyphenolic and condensed aromatic molecular formulae, while leaving the residual DOM enriched in highly unsaturated and aliphatic constituents. These compositional shifts were accompanied by decreases in aromaticity, double-bond equivalents, nominal oxidation state of carbon, and average molecular mass, indicating selective sequestration of aromatic, higher molecular weight DOM. Our results demonstrate that PVPP acts as a strongly selective, but not perfectly specific, adsorbent for phenolic-rich DOM and substantially alters the composition of the remaining DOM pool. This work provides a molecular-level framework for interpreting PVP/PVPP-based phenolic manipulation experiments and establishes best practice guidance for their application in peatland and aquatic biogeochemical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.